NEW The 2026 State of AI Trust Report is now available. Read the report →

Assurance Platform

The methodology every engagement runs on

Structured assessment frameworks mapped to ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act — so a finding means the same thing across teams, sectors, and years.

Capabilities

What this module provides

Framework library Maintained assessment frameworks per system class: predictive models, language model applications, agentic systems, and embedded AI in purchased software.
Control mappings Each criterion mapped to the clauses of the standards it satisfies, so one piece of evidence can serve several obligations.
Severity model A published severity scale tied to consequence, applied consistently rather than negotiated per engagement.
Versioning Frameworks are versioned. Every report records the version it was assessed under, so historical findings remain interpretable.

Applied consistently

The same criteria, whoever performs the assessment

Assessors work from the framework, not from memory. Every judgement call that is not fully determined by the criteria is recorded as such, so a reader can see where discretion was exercised.

  • Documented criteria
  • Recorded discretion
  • Peer review
  • Calibration exercises
  • Dispute procedure
  • Published change log
See the service lines
Governance committee convened in a large meeting room.

Standards

Anchored to published criteria

ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Artificial intelligence management system (AIMS) — the certifiable organisational standard for governing AI.
NIST AI RMF 1.0
The Govern, Map, Measure, Manage functions, plus the Generative AI Profile (NIST AI 600-1).
EU AI Act
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — the first comprehensive, risk-tiered statutory regime for AI.
prEN 18286
The draft European harmonised standard for AI quality management systems under the AI Act.

Deploy AI with confidence.

Start with an independent assessment of your highest-stakes AI system.